quote:
There’s 2 posters on this board who really aren’t worth responding to.

One of them is- obviously- Pete Golding himself. Although, given his posting history and behavior, it could be one of Pete Golding’s children.

The other is either Pete Golding’s father or his gay lover who has a larger football vocabulary and uses football vernacular that Pete, himself has never even heard of (“tackle,” for instance, and, “eleven,” for another) and throws it around so people will think he’s somewhat knowledgeable. His efforts are unsuccessful.

There’s a 3rd type of poster, here, and those are the ones who think Nick Saban is infallible in every decision he makes. Those are also not worth the effort.

These people are Golding’s Groupies and think he invented defense in college football for the SOLE reason that Nick Saban, thus far, has kept him on staff and will argue with you vehemently that Golding is the greatest Defensive coach in the history of college football despite the overwhelming evidence that he’s really a moron who backed into the job, doesn’t know how many people can be on the field at one time, and is generally incompetent at his job.

That is until Saban does get rid of him. When that day comes, those very same posters will spit on the ground every time his name is mentioned and will claim they knew he wasn’t a good coach and wished Saban had gotten rid of him the moment he was hired.

They did the same thing with Nussmeier. The very same thing.

Anyway, Pete and his lover aren’t worth arguing with, here.

If you are incapable of understand the circumstances around the front 7 last year, then it's your problem.

However, I notice this post has many upvotes, while you call people on the disagreeing side gay and many other names.

And I get a warning if I call you a fricking idiot.