Started By
Message

re: Clemson Tators are loaded in 2020 | Impact players returning

Posted on 1/22/20 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by NFLSU
Screwston, Texas
Member since Oct 2014
16708 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 12:16 pm to
Holy apples to oranges.

Back to my original statement - dynasty teams don't play the role of underdogs.

...or squeak by teams like UNC who decided to run the option to the short side of the field on a 2-pt conversion to win the game.

Clemson is a great team and a great program.

They're not a dynasty.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65428 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Holy apples to oranges.

how so? Does the definition of how often you need to win a national title change because the sport is different? But seeing how you completely dodged the question, I think I have my answer.

Or maybe you can provide me a long list of more impressive runs in college football history if Clemson were to win next year. That should be easy right?

quote:

dynasty teams don't play the role of underdogs.

only Dabo calls or has called Clemson an actual underdog in the true sense of the word. The media was pretty split on the game this year and no one was digging their heels in on either school. It was nothing more than a slight edge, and that's what you'd expect in a national title game with two undefeated teams
quote:

They're not a dynasty.

If they win a national title next year, only you will hold that opinion
This post was edited on 1/22/20 at 12:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter