Started By
Message
re: All 27 supplements issued by Clemson tested negative. Clears Clemson.
Posted on 5/24/19 at 4:07 pm to cubsfan5150
Posted on 5/24/19 at 4:07 pm to cubsfan5150
So lets follow the logic Clemson fans are putting forward here.
1). The athletes say they don't know how the banned substance got in their system. They pass a polygraph test to that effect.
2). Clemson submits all supplements to be tested for the banned substance. All test negative for the substance.
So that can only lead to the conclusion that the athletes took the substance without prior knowledge and it was not in a supplement. Doesn't that mean that it must have somehow been provided BY the university without the athletes knowledge? It can be dosed orally.
1). The athletes say they don't know how the banned substance got in their system. They pass a polygraph test to that effect.
2). Clemson submits all supplements to be tested for the banned substance. All test negative for the substance.
So that can only lead to the conclusion that the athletes took the substance without prior knowledge and it was not in a supplement. Doesn't that mean that it must have somehow been provided BY the university without the athletes knowledge? It can be dosed orally.
1
Posted on 5/24/19 at 4:57 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
1). The athletes say they don't know how the banned substance got in their system. They pass a polygraph test to that effect.
2). Clemson submits all supplements to be tested for the banned substance. All test negative for the substance.
Conclusion: Obviously, Alabama tried to contaminate their food and these were the ones who were caught. REC doing work.
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 4:58 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News