Started By
Message
Who has an offense in the East?
Posted on 9/4/17 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 9/4/17 at 7:52 pm
Could be the perfect storm, everyone's Offense outside of Mizzou looks rough or is missing their QB
3
Posted on 9/4/17 at 7:54 pm to TigerCruise
Terrible year not to have a D. If we continue to play defense like the MOST game, every east team will have an offense against us.
Hopefully we see improvement next week. SC does have an offense
Hopefully we see improvement next week. SC does have an offense
Posted on 9/4/17 at 8:28 pm to TigerCruise
Well, UT and UF look pretty fricking terrible that's for sure.
71 total yards for UT in a half.
UF had under 200 for the game.
Vandy had no running game.
UK looked like garbage.
UGA is missing Eason but still has the rushing attack, our weakness, though less of a weakness than our shite pass D.
Carolina. Do they have a rushing attack?
If Mizzou can build ANY decent lead on a team, they need to mix in heavy doses of pure Crockett drives to burn clock.
71 total yards for UT in a half.
UF had under 200 for the game.
Vandy had no running game.
UK looked like garbage.
UGA is missing Eason but still has the rushing attack, our weakness, though less of a weakness than our shite pass D.
Carolina. Do they have a rushing attack?
If Mizzou can build ANY decent lead on a team, they need to mix in heavy doses of pure Crockett drives to burn clock.
Posted on 9/4/17 at 8:39 pm to Athos
Carolina had 30 rushing yards and NC State doubled them up on total yards.
Carolina's entire offense goes through Samuel
Carolina's entire offense goes through Samuel
Posted on 9/4/17 at 8:52 pm to TigerCruise
I think this year might be the worst the East has ever been, seriously. Every East team looks like straight garbage.
Posted on 9/4/17 at 8:57 pm to ZOU
At least we have an offense. Well. Should have an offense.
I'd rather have a top offense and shite D than go through the pain of a terrible offense that can't do squat. Watching the Lambs before Stank left town with them was miserable.
I'd rather have a top offense and shite D than go through the pain of a terrible offense that can't do squat. Watching the Lambs before Stank left town with them was miserable.
Posted on 9/4/17 at 9:09 pm to Athos
It's hard to look at these teams and not envision a run.
Posted on 9/4/17 at 11:30 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
It's hard to look at these teams and not envision a run.
Yep. Our offense is better than any of the East teams I watched this weekend.
If I were a South Carolina fan I would be shitting myself looking at Mizzou offense last year/start of this year and what USC did defensively against NCST last week. I don't know how our defense will perform but the Mizzou offense is clearly better than NCST.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 12:02 am to kilo
Odom may not be the man of the future but I must commend him on the huge turnaround for the offense. Heupel was a great hire. I'm not a fan of high tempo offenses but I do agree it gives us advantages against a lot of teams.
Posted on 9/5/17 at 1:10 am to Athos
I agree. I'm still a Rams fan even though they moved to LA and I think Goff is going to be a bust. Kroenke is a shite bag but I care about the organization and the players, not him. They've had a terrible offense since 2007 and it's so frustrating to watch.
The 2015 Mizzou offense was the worst though since I support Mizzou 10x more than the Rams. Would have never imagined with Odom as HC that we'd have a great offense with a terrible defense but atleast I can tolerate it over the contrary.
The 2015 Mizzou offense was the worst though since I support Mizzou 10x more than the Rams. Would have never imagined with Odom as HC that we'd have a great offense with a terrible defense but atleast I can tolerate it over the contrary.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News