Started By
Message
re: I spent the last 4 hours or so listening ( rosebowl was right!)
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:04 pm to Commander Data
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:04 pm to Commander Data
There is a difference between 'administration says' and 'citation of direct quote in legal document'. I didn't lose. I've given two different verifiable accounts that he said that from people who have seen his transcript. No one has ever shown any account from anyone who has seen the transcript that says he didn't. Because no such account exists. Back of the line.
This post was edited on 8/20/17 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:14 pm to VivaZapata27
Bro, the information is coming from Ole Miss sources who by all means have no credibility left in the matter. The fact you accept them at their word is asinine. I am one that doesn't wish to see you crippled even though you deserve it but bro, Leo Lewis told the truth and you guys were fricked even without his testimony. Regardless, who do you think the ncaa hearing is going to believe, the ncaa/Lewis or the Ole Miss defense? You are so fricked.
Posted on 8/20/17 at 4:26 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
I spent the last 4 hours or so listening ( rosebowl was right!) There is a difference between 'administration says' and 'citation of direct quote in legal document'. I didn't lose. I've given two different verifiable accounts that he said that from people who have seen his transcript. No one has ever shown any account from anyone who has seen the transcript that says he didn't. Because no such account exists. Back of the line.
That is hearsay. I find it very odd that there is no citation of a direct quote
Posted on 8/20/17 at 8:21 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:the "citation" part is the problem. if it's so rock solid, then where has the ncaa or lewis himself corroborated it? this really isn't nearly as complex as you're making it out to be
There is a difference between 'administration says' and 'citation of direct quote in legal document'.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News