Started By
Message
Missouri football has been more relevant than LSU since expansion.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:20 pm
How bizarre.
36
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:20 pm to Tuscaloosa
Now this is a thread I can get behind.
Short.
Subtle.
To the point.
TOTY
10/10
Short.
Subtle.
To the point.
TOTY
10/10
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:21 pm to Tuscaloosa
Oooh baby
It's making me crazy
Every time I come around
It's in my face
It's making me crazy
Every time I come around
It's in my face
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:22 pm to Tuscaloosa
Crazy isn't it?
Bathe in the glorious downvotes coming your way OP
Bathe in the glorious downvotes coming your way OP
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:22 pm to Tuscaloosa
Looks like the Gumps got bored with Aggy gagging on them so now they have the puppy killers on their knees.
Nice.
Nice.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:23 pm to NFLSU
Or maybe he is stating facts.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:25 pm to Tuscaloosa
and frick Auburn and LSU.Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:25 pm to TigerTalker16
And Tennessee, too.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:27 pm to Tuscaloosa
This thread was seriously a work of art Tuscaloosa.
POTY.
POTY.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:29 pm to NFLSU
quote:
NFLSU
even in a thread that has nothing to do with aggy you cant help but talk about us. thanks for the BJ, i guess
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:30 pm to Tuscaloosa
Define relevant...
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:31 pm to Tuscaloosa
Missouri is in the SEC?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:31 pm to America1776
quote:
Define relevant...
Challenging for a conference championship at a minimum.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:32 pm to 12Pence
quote:
Missouri is in the SEC?
Crazy, right? A team that some people aren't even aware is in the SEC is more relevant than LSU. Wild.
I've always liked Mizzou.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:33 pm to Tuscaloosa
Interesting definition!
Do you consider 42-13 challenging?
Do you consider 42-13 challenging?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:34 pm to Tuscaloosa
How were they more relevant than LSU? Because of 2 east titles that they stumbled into?
This is weak shite and you don't even believe it
This is weak shite and you don't even believe it
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:36 pm to Tuscaloosa
I guess winning a weak Eastern division twice and/or a 19-21 SEC record is relevant? 
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:37 pm to VermilionTiger
Yeah stumbled.
Stumbled to a Top 5 finish nationally too.
Okay frickwad.
Stumbled to a Top 5 finish nationally too.
Okay frickwad.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:38 pm to America1776
quote:
Interesting definition!
2-0 is much more impressive than 42-13.
Division championships give a lot more relevance than a single meaningless game. It's clear which program is in better shape overall.
How has a program such as LSU fallen below Missouri? Very odd.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:38 pm to VermilionTiger
Mizzou went 4-0 during the SEC regular season against the West those two seasons. I don't want to bring up the west teams we beat because it may be even more embarrassing for our LSU hosts.
Page 1 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News