Started By
Message
re: Missouri football has been more relevant than LSU since expansion.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:32 pm to 12Pence
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:32 pm to 12Pence
quote:
Missouri is in the SEC?
Crazy, right? A team that some people aren't even aware is in the SEC is more relevant than LSU. Wild.
I've always liked Mizzou.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:34 pm to Tuscaloosa
How were they more relevant than LSU? Because of 2 east titles that they stumbled into?
This is weak shite and you don't even believe it
This is weak shite and you don't even believe it
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:36 pm to Tuscaloosa
I guess winning a weak Eastern division twice and/or a 19-21 SEC record is relevant? ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)