Started By
Message

re: What is/was the alternative on offense?

Posted on 11/28/16 at 8:03 pm to
Posted by gatorbait_007
Clemson, SC
Member since Oct 2013
924 posts
Posted on 11/28/16 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

They're also 5 - 7, are you sure you want to be using them as a barometer?


We are talking about offensive production right. They are 16th in the nation in that category. So they are 5-7 with an offense. If they had a our defense they would've won more games. At least Strong had the balls to play a Freshman with his job on the line and people asking his head before the season. You created the thread the topic was offense not overall record.

quote:

Sorry, kiddo, I think I'll take a conference championship and a winning record. Thanks for your input.


What conference championship the east isn't a conference and no way in hell do we beat Bama. Back to back SEC EAST champions looks great on our Wikipedia page. You realize how bad the east is. It is the worst it has been in 10 years. He has beat 2 teams with winning records this year there is nothing spectacular about that. The way you talk you would think teams call you for guidance and analysis. You are nothing but a fan just like everyone else. You come on here and spew the same crap week after week, same excuses week after week. We haven't improved overall on offense one bit if anything we regressed. Take McElwain's nuts off your chin and open your eyes Kiddo. Thanks for you expert input.
This post was edited on 11/28/16 at 8:14 pm
Posted by reel_gator8
Seminole,Fl
Member since May 2012
11060 posts
Posted on 11/28/16 at 8:16 pm to
Ok...so 5-7 and playing a true frosh QB is a moral victory now? You guys would be screaming for Mac's head.

Sooo...forget W/L records lets entertain fans now? So much horsecrap.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter