Started By
Message
re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift
Posted on 9/25/16 at 3:05 pm to BamaGradinTn
Posted on 9/25/16 at 3:05 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Why during the first rule of the targeting rule could the ejection be overturned on review but not the penalty itself?
So your defense of one shitty rule is to say "look at this other shifty rule"?
quote:
Everything in the book may not always make perfect sense to everyone. When obvious abuse occurs, rules get changed.
Again, why do we need to wait until obvious abuse occurs to change the rule? Lsu benefitted from this rule last night.
1
Posted on 9/25/16 at 3:07 pm to Open Your Eyes
and what about this that was posted last night.
quote:
b. The 10-second rule does not apply if the game clock is not running
when the foul occurs or if the foul does not cause the game clock to
stop immediately (e.g., illegal formation).
c. After the penalty is administered, if there is a 10-second runoff, the
game clock starts on the referee’s signal. If there is no 10-second runoff,
the game clock starts on the snap.
The rule doesn't mention anything about the penalized play. In this case the penalize play resulted in a first down that was inbound but the penalty negates the play.
So the argument that the clock starts on the whistle because the first down pass was downed inbounds is irrelevant.
Rule 3,4,4,c
(Dont care about game, we deserved to lose, but the officating crew was a fricking joke)
Whatever they did was not correct call. fricked up an gave Auburn 5 downs two.
quote:
b. The 10-second rule does not apply if the game clock is not running
when the foul occurs or if the foul does not cause the game clock to
stop immediately (e.g., illegal formation).
c. After the penalty is administered, if there is a 10-second runoff, the
game clock starts on the referee’s signal. If there is no 10-second runoff,
the game clock starts on the snap.
The rule doesn't mention anything about the penalized play. In this case the penalize play resulted in a first down that was inbound but the penalty negates the play.
So the argument that the clock starts on the whistle because the first down pass was downed inbounds is irrelevant.
Rule 3,4,4,c
(Dont care about game, we deserved to lose, but the officating crew was a fricking joke)
Whatever they did was not correct call. fricked up an gave Auburn 5 downs two.
This post was edited on 9/25/16 at 3:10 pm
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News