Started By
Message

re: Rules Experts: The lack of a runoff after illegal shift

Posted on 9/25/16 at 2:46 pm to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26996 posts
Posted on 9/25/16 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

The clock is stopped when it otherwise would not have been, because of the penalty. The offense is benefitting from committing a penalty. Why is that?


Why during the first rule of the targeting rule could the ejection be overturned on review but not the penalty itself? Everything in the book may not always make perfect sense to everyone. When obvious abuse occurs, rules get changed.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 9/25/16 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Why during the first rule of the targeting rule could the ejection be overturned on review but not the penalty itself?


So your defense of one shitty rule is to say "look at this other shifty rule"?

quote:

Everything in the book may not always make perfect sense to everyone. When obvious abuse occurs, rules get changed.


Again, why do we need to wait until obvious abuse occurs to change the rule? Lsu be benefitted from this rule last night.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 9/25/16 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Why during the first rule of the targeting rule could the ejection be overturned on review but not the penalty itself?


So your defense of one shitty rule is to say "look at this other shifty rule"?

quote:

Everything in the book may not always make perfect sense to everyone. When obvious abuse occurs, rules get changed.


Again, why do we need to wait until obvious abuse occurs to change the rule? Lsu benefitted from this rule last night.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter