Started By
Message

re: Does pat forde have it in for ole miss?

Posted on 8/28/16 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2313 posts
Posted on 8/28/16 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

You are saying that Cam incident was not a technical NCAA violation that the Dad took the $$$$$, as long as junior was unawares. Accordingly, same result as Tunsils stepdad taking the $800 and free hotel rooms?


They never could prove that Cecil's dad took money. If they had proven that Cecil got paid by either MSU or Auburn, then Cam would have been ruled ineligible. They could only prove that Cecil ASKED for money. Of course, if Cam had asked for money, or had authorized Cecil asking for money, then that also would have been a violation.

Also, Cecil asking for money was a violation of the SEC Bylaws, but Mike Slive just decided not to enforce that provision.
This post was edited on 8/28/16 at 4:51 pm
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 8/28/16 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

They never could prove that Cecil's dad took money. If they had proven that Cecil got paid by either MSU or Auburn, then Cam would have been ruled ineligible. They could only prove that Cecil ASKED for money. Of course, if Cam had asked for money, or had authorized Cecil asking for money, then that also would have been a violation.

Also, Cecil asking for money was a violation of the SEC Bylaws, but Mike Slive just decided not to enforce that provision.


I can tell by the tenor of your post you don't think for yourself much, but again Forde in the nature of his reporting is wrong.

You are also categorically wrong about the assertion you make concerning the SEC By-laws. Here's a Forbes article to help you understand.

LINK

Try reading more and listening to talk radio less.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter