quote:
So it wasn't that he was "wrong", as you originally said, you just didn't like the tone of his reporting? Get over it. You should always read articles for the facts and try to ignore any bias.

For the present article, Forde has revealed the NCAA is granting immunity to players at other schools to ask about UMiss recruiting. That's really all we should glean from that. Could be those interviews reveal nothing new and result in zero additional allegations, but its still more information that we all had before.

There's no reason to whine about Forde hurting your widdle feewings six years ago, because the reported facts were true.

I do believe the tenor and nature of the reporting was wrong...that is why I stated it.

Forde is unprofessional in his approach...his record reflects it. It is possible to report the info without stoking fires that don't exist.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Dday63

Member since Sep 2014

2324 posts

Posted on 8/27/16 at 9:27 pm to Tigerman97

The reason you didn't like Forde's tone, was because you didn't like the facts he was reporting.

Now you say "he got so much wrong on Cam" that you don't think UMiss should worry about the current article, even though you can't point to any facts he got wrong on the Cam situation and say it was just the "tone and nature of his reporting."

His current article on the Rebels just states facts. You could question the timing of the article, I guess, but he says the interviews took place within the last month. There's no bias or slant in his article.

I don't give a shite about Pat Forde, but you're suggesting his facts are wrong just because he rustled your jimmies six years ago....