Started By
Message
re: Should 6-6 teams be allowed to go to bowls?
Posted on 8/6/16 at 1:31 pm to UFFan
Posted on 8/6/16 at 1:31 pm to UFFan
They've made making a bowl a completely meaningless "achievement"
You can go 2-6 in conference and make a bowl, it's completely ridiculous.
If they wanna keep 6-6 teams making bowls, fine. But I don't wanna hear any dumb arse fans bragging about making these bowls like their teams actually accomplished anything.
Throughout most of history you had to be a conference champion or a highly ranked team to make a bowl. That's why making a bowl was meaningful and why it isn't any longer.
You can go 2-6 in conference and make a bowl, it's completely ridiculous.
If they wanna keep 6-6 teams making bowls, fine. But I don't wanna hear any dumb arse fans bragging about making these bowls like their teams actually accomplished anything.
Throughout most of history you had to be a conference champion or a highly ranked team to make a bowl. That's why making a bowl was meaningful and why it isn't any longer.
1
Posted on 8/6/16 at 10:13 pm to IAmReality
quote:
They've made making a bowl a completely meaningless "achievement"
this right here.^^^ I vote no 6-6 teams shouldnt. there are too many meaningless bs bowls. they shouldnt have a record requirement. just cap it at something reasonable like 15 bowls plus the playoff. that gets the top 34 teams into the post season. if you aint top 34 nobody really gives a frick about you anyway.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News