Started By
Message
re: Was Texas A&M considered a Big12 fball power?
Posted on 5/18/16 at 9:48 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 5/18/16 at 9:48 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
We have done better in the SEC than the Big 12. Why is that?
From a purely football standpoint, is it more fair to say you have done better outside of your conference while in the SEC than in the last five years of your time in the Big12.
But that strictly conference wise, you've been about the same?
You've beat the two strongest teams in your division one time since you have been in the SEC. You've won the conference title zero times. Maybe I am missing the sarcasm about doing better in the SEC.
1
Posted on 5/18/16 at 9:55 am to oman
quote:
more fair to say you have done better outside of your conference while in the SEC than in the last five years of your time in the Big12.
But that strictly conference wise, you've been about the same?
17-15 vs. 15-18, so no.
By the accounts on this board, our record should have been at least several games worse due to the supposed difficulty of the SEC. Removing Manziel (who transitions between a generational talent and a lucky substance abuse addict depending on the topic, but that's different) we've gone 7-9 the last two years vs a .500 record in the Big 12 under Sherman. Why are the records so close?
This post was edited on 5/18/16 at 9:57 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News