Started By
Message
re: Could Oklahoma screw the BIG XII?
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:29 pm to texashorn
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:29 pm to texashorn
quote:
Moreover, all the Big 12 issues (individual third-tier networks and unequal TV money distributions based on appearances) were approved each and every time by A&M, Oklahoma, Nebraska and Missouri.
You mean like the 2009 season where the Big 12 office and ABC violated their own contract that required every conference member to be televised on ABC at least once by not televising A&M on ABC once that season?
Go ahead, dispute my facts. Post a link disputing that A&M was the least-televised team in America in 2009.
Game 1 - New Mexico (No TV)
Game 2 - Utah State (No TV)
Game 3 - UAB (No TV)
(1) Game 4 - Arkansas (ESPN2)
(2) Game 5 - Oklahoma State (FSN National)
(3) Game 6 - at Kansas State (Fox College - Central)
Game 7 - at Texas Tech (No TV)
Game 8 - Iowa State (No TV)
(4) Game 9 - at Colorado (Fox College - Central)
(5) Game 10 - at Oklahoma (FSN National)
Game 11 - Baylor (No TV)
(6) Game 12 - Texas (ESPN)
Is it any coincidence that the realignment mess began after the 2009 season?
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:30 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Please post a link proving that the Big 12 contract with ABC provided for an appearance on the national over-the-air network at least one time in the 2009 football season for each Big 12 football school.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News