Started By
Message

re: Could Oklahoma screw the BIG XII?

Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80786 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Moreover, all the Big 12 issues (individual third-tier networks and unequal TV money distributions based on appearances) were approved each and every time by A&M, Oklahoma, Nebraska and Missouri.


You mean like the 2009 season where the Big 12 office and ABC violated their own contract that required every conference member to be televised on ABC at least once by not televising A&M on ABC once that season?

Go ahead, dispute my facts. Post a link disputing that A&M was the least-televised team in America in 2009.

Game 1 - New Mexico (No TV)

Game 2 - Utah State (No TV)

Game 3 - UAB (No TV)

(1) Game 4 - Arkansas (ESPN2)

(2) Game 5 - Oklahoma State (FSN National)

(3) Game 6 - at Kansas State (Fox College - Central)

Game 7 - at Texas Tech (No TV)

Game 8 - Iowa State (No TV)

(4) Game 9 - at Colorado (Fox College - Central)

(5) Game 10 - at Oklahoma (FSN National)

Game 11 - Baylor (No TV)

(6) Game 12 - Texas (ESPN)

Is it any coincidence that the realignment mess began after the 2009 season?
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 2:30 pm
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:30 pm to
Please post a link proving that the Big 12 contract with ABC provided for an appearance on the national over-the-air network at least one time in the 2009 football season for each Big 12 football school.

Thanks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter