Started By
Message
re: NCAA Tournament Selection - SEC
Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:22 pm to MeatPants
Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:22 pm to MeatPants
quote:
Tulsa is horrible too. 6-6 against tourney teams. Includes Iona and ualr
Thats pretty good man. 12 games against NCAA tourney teams and they won half of them. Take out SMU who is 13 in RPI and they have 10 games against tourney teams and they're still winning half of them. Thats damn good actually.
quote:
Tulsa was just a dog crap team
Dog crap teams don't win the games they won. Dog crap teams don't go .500 against the tourney field with as many as 10-12 games as a sample size.
quote:
I would say Carolina was a more quality team that just didn't test itself enough to get a Better gauge
You can't use "what you think" as a barometer to include a team in the tourney. You can only use what you know, and what you know is that Carolina only played 2 top 50 teams and only played 4 teams in the NCAA tourney field. 3 of those 4 teams were in their own league, and only one was OOC. So that isn't a good sample size on how a team will fare against tourney teams, who aren't in their own league.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:29 pm to Hawgeye
For example....Arkansas wasn't very good this year, but we still managed to have more wins against NCAAt teams than South Carolina did.
Arkansas went 4-4 against NCAA tourney teams. Texas Tech was an OOC tourney team win. Southern was an OOC tourney win.
South Carolina scheduled so poorly, there was no reason to let them in. Just like every other year.
Arkansas went 4-4 against NCAA tourney teams. Texas Tech was an OOC tourney team win. Southern was an OOC tourney win.
South Carolina scheduled so poorly, there was no reason to let them in. Just like every other year.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)