Holy crap is Carolina schedule bad. 3-1 against NCAA tourney teams

Tulsa is horrible too. 6-6 against tourney teams. Includes Iona and ualr

It's how you value it. Volume or quantity over actual performance. I would say Carolina was a more quality team that just didn't test itself enough to get a Better gauge

Tulsa was just a dog crap team that got lucky that u conn hit a three quarter court shot or their "cut and dried numbers" wouldn't look so great.

But it's subjective even though some don't think so

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by MeatPants

Member since Nov 2015

8853 posts

Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:15 pm to MeatPants

Gonzaga is not a top 50 win if I'm not mistaken

This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 2:16 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hawgeye

tFlagship Brothel

Member since Jun 2009

31103 posts

Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:22 pm to MeatPants

quote:
Tulsa is horrible too. 6-6 against tourney teams. Includes Iona and ualr

Thats pretty good man. 12 games against NCAA tourney teams and they won half of them. Take out SMU who is 13 in RPI and they have 10 games against tourney teams and they're still winning half of them. Thats damn good actually.

quote:
Tulsa was just a dog crap team

Dog crap teams don't win the games they won. Dog crap teams don't go .500 against the tourney field with as many as 10-12 games as a sample size.

quote:
I would say Carolina was a more quality team that just didn't test itself enough to get a Better gauge

You can't use "what you think" as a barometer to include a team in the tourney. You can only use what you know, and what you know is that Carolina only played 2 top 50 teams and only played 4 teams in the NCAA tourney field. 3 of those 4 teams were in their own league, and only one was OOC. So that isn't a good sample size on how a team will fare against tourney teams, who aren't in their own league.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board