actually, yes. If he offers (at minimum) tacit approval of their actions while he chastises a kid on his team for doing the right thing, then he is perpetuating the culture that will ultimately harm others and prove to be his downfall.

This isn't a "free speech" issues. This is a "leader of men" issue, and if what is alleged of Jones is true, he's failing.

Freedom of speech does not = freedom of consequence.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by dreaux

baton rouge

Member since Oct 2006

40881 posts

Posted on 2/24/16 at 5:42 pm to bamasgot13

You fricking serious??? So if I tell you all cops should die, you going to grab a gun and start shooting them???

To be clear..I'm not condoning what is purported. Im simply stating there is a legitimate claim to privacy between two people. We can't possibly know the whole story. But to destroy someones career and livlyhood for ANY frickking words said is absurd. Called him a traitor...

Big fricking deal. It's not what you "think" or "say"... Only what you actually do matters.

Was he joking...??? Debating??? Smart arse retort??? Even if it was on purpose. Still....

Reprimand the man...total destruction is not warranted. Sad part of the PC society we live in...the whole issue MAY be overstated as everyone gets 5 minutes on their soap box. I can see I'm prolly won't be back in this thread.

Just to be clear...if it's true, he's a fricking insensitive a-hole and I don't condone that...

3 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board