Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Bjork says NCAA investigation into Ole Miss is over
Posted on 2/10/16 at 9:23 pm to pankReb
Posted on 2/10/16 at 9:23 pm to pankReb
quote:
Have you asked yourself why they would make a 2nd letter when they could just include it in the first one?
Honestly, that's how I would do it. Especially if events were related. I would let you form your defense, then see how that defense holds up with any other allegations I found. Which also leaves you open to getting caught in a lie. Rolling out allegations in waves seems like a good way to make sure someone is forthcoming.
Not saying there is a second letter, I don't know and don't really care. But if you're a lawyer you wouldn't pose all your questions and then give the defense time to come up with a response that covers all of them, you would roll them out one at a time.
Posted on 2/10/16 at 9:32 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
Honestly that is how I would do it
Stopped reading here and knew a horrible reasoning was coming for how that would make sense.
Posted on 2/10/16 at 10:10 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
But if you're a lawyer you wouldn't pose all your questions and then give the defense time to come up with a response that covers all of them, you would roll them out one at a time.
Do you have any idea how a court of law works?
You can't legally just spring shite on the opposition. Every piece of evidence, every witness, every aspect of your side of the case has to be made known to the opposition during the all the processes leading up to the trial.
If you try and spring new shite while in court then that shite gets struck from the record and can't be used in deciding the case.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)