Started By
Message

re: Muschamp wasn't the problem.

Posted on 9/10/15 at 8:29 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141015 posts
Posted on 9/10/15 at 8:29 pm to
You disagree that Muschamp crippled UF for a while and was terrible at what he was hired and paid to do?

Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 9/10/15 at 8:32 pm to
quote:


You disagree that Muschamp crippled UF for a while and was terrible at what he was hired and paid to do?


Not sure its for a while-- his recruiting was a bit sub par, but judging by how QBs play once the Muscancer is gone (either by transferring out or waiting til he's fired) we might bounce back a lot quicker than people think.
Posted by footballfan4
Member since Sep 2015
58 posts
Posted on 9/10/15 at 8:35 pm to
Muschamp really just returned Florida to where they have been during most of their existence.

Your program was about in the same level as Moo State before Spurrier and then returned to that level during the Zook regime. As much success as Urban had earliy in his career, things even started going south during his final year or two. Probably part of the reason he left in the first place
Posted by jsmoove
Member since Oct 2010
12627 posts
Posted on 9/10/15 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

You disagree that Muschamp crippled UF for a while and was terrible at what he was hired and paid to do?



Did Auburn even face Muschamp at UF? If so, it was only once. Urban Cryer never beat Auburn.
This post was edited on 9/10/15 at 8:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter