quote:
On that we may agree provided you expound upon it a bit by perhaps delving into what a couple of our founding fathers had to say about the dangers of a two-party system, (hint: Adams and Washington), and why the two party system has led us to this dysfunctional government we have today.

The two party system is fine. We've had a three party system before and it let in Woodrow Wilson, and a hyperconservative like you would probably recognize him as one of the worst Presidents we've ever had. Coalitions, 5 parties. All that European shite isn't any better. The problem with our government now is the Federal Reserve, rampant corporatism, entitlements, the Military Industrial Complex, Healthcare(not Obamacare, what we had before that), and Obama's shitty energy policy. Not two parties. Two parties is such a red herring I can't respect anyone's intelligence that spends their time worrying about that.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by scrooster

Resident Ethicist

Member since Jul 2012

37999 posts

Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:00 pm to TeLeFaWx

... but you see, no one gives a fat baby's arse about whom it is that you respect when it comes to any perspective or philosophy.

Labeling me an ultra conservative just illustrates your fricktardedness and the high level thereof.

I do agree with certain specific elements of your perceived reality .... it's adolescent, even sophomoric, yet I suppose even a blind pig finds an acorn from time to time.

Then there is your red-herring hypocrisy concerning The Fed.

I do get a kick of how quickly you ultra leftie socialist communists redirect the discussion away from your dedications to Lucifer.

1 ...

Report Post

Off-Topic Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board