Started By
Message
re: Two Arkansas golfers arrested on voyeurism charges
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:44 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:44 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:Sexually explicit isn't constrained to intercourse or sexual acts. Nudity is also sexually explicit...
How a woman is just in a shirt for photos can be labeled sexually explicit is a stretch bro.
1
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:46 pm to joeyb147
So then she wasn't in her shirt for the photos?
By the way, you and I disagree on what sexually explicit means.
According to lectlaw.com
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT
So the only thing that can come close is just the showing of the genitals in a lascivious way. There is nothing to suggest she wasn't wearing underwear with the shirt. I will agree with you that there are some unknowns but it doesn't look good for them either way. Although if rape isn't a charge will be a lot better.
By the way, you and I disagree on what sexually explicit means.
According to lectlaw.com
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT
quote:
Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person. 18 USC
So the only thing that can come close is just the showing of the genitals in a lascivious way. There is nothing to suggest she wasn't wearing underwear with the shirt. I will agree with you that there are some unknowns but it doesn't look good for them either way. Although if rape isn't a charge will be a lot better.
This post was edited on 5/6/15 at 5:53 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News