Started By
Message
re: Who would the SEC replace Missouri with?
Posted on 4/20/15 at 12:51 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Posted on 4/20/15 at 12:51 pm to nebraskafaninwi
Clemson
Posted on 4/20/15 at 1:38 pm to rmnldr
quote:
Clemson
picking up a school from a small state where the SEC already has a team is useless for market share/revenue generating. It would be like adding ULM, or L'ville, or ga tech. All he media provides in those states already know they have to carry the SECN b/c of the dominant team in that state.
Picking up a team from NC, or VA or OK would make since for adding market share though.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News