Started By
Message

re: Mizzou losing Steckel

Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Why? It's a shitty job and likely won't even result in a raise.


and yet it's as good as he could expect to get,, so what does that tell you?

quote:

Odom would be a great hire.


while that's purely subjective, it's certainly unlikely he would be any worse than Stec or Eberflus, and since he knows Mizzou/Pinkels program it would be an easy transition.

Who would I rather have? Muschamp.

Since we would be in line behind AU, A&M and likely SC as well, I realize it would almost never happen, but well, since you asked.

Unlike Kiffin who has basically stepped in at Bama and kept his trap shut, I see no chance Peelini could manage not being the loose canon that he is. So while he would be an upgrade as a coach, would rather not upset the chemistry in the current staff.

Given Pinkel likes to promote from within, let's hope Kul has the football mind he seems to possess, of the current position coaches he does seem to be the clear choice.


This post was edited on 12/13/14 at 4:31 pm
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:32 pm to
I guess I should have said realistic option other than Kul or Odom.

There surely are others. I just have no clue. Muschamp isn't an option. That I do know.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:57 pm to
Lol, Auburn already hired Muschamp and is paying him about 3 times what we paid Steckel.

All he is would be a bigger name. Odom has made great progress with the defense at Memphis.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter