Started By
Message
re: Mizzou losing Steckel
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:29 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:29 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Why? It's a shitty job and likely won't even result in a raise.
and yet it's as good as he could expect to get,, so what does that tell you?
quote:
Odom would be a great hire.
while that's purely subjective, it's certainly unlikely he would be any worse than Stec or Eberflus, and since he knows Mizzou/Pinkels program it would be an easy transition.
Who would I rather have? Muschamp.
Since we would be in line behind AU, A&M and likely SC as well, I realize it would almost never happen, but well, since you asked.
Unlike Kiffin who has basically stepped in at Bama and kept his trap shut, I see no chance Peelini could manage not being the loose canon that he is. So while he would be an upgrade as a coach, would rather not upset the chemistry in the current staff.
Given Pinkel likes to promote from within, let's hope Kul has the football mind he seems to possess, of the current position coaches he does seem to be the clear choice.
This post was edited on 12/13/14 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:32 pm to Jagd Tiger
I guess I should have said realistic option other than Kul or Odom.
There surely are others. I just have no clue. Muschamp isn't an option. That I do know.
There surely are others. I just have no clue. Muschamp isn't an option. That I do know.
Posted on 12/13/14 at 4:57 pm to Jagd Tiger
Lol, Auburn already hired Muschamp and is paying him about 3 times what we paid Steckel.
All he is would be a bigger name. Odom has made great progress with the defense at Memphis.
All he is would be a bigger name. Odom has made great progress with the defense at Memphis.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News