Started By
Message
re: Coaching Changes Discussion - Chief locked up, what about rest?
Posted on 12/29/14 at 8:10 am to tmc94
Posted on 12/29/14 at 8:10 am to tmc94
I agree, but legally it would probably only be bad faith if he entered th contract not intending to perform his duties while under the agreement or not intending to pay th buyout if he could no longer perform hi duties because he entered into a competing agreement.
1
Posted on 12/29/14 at 11:20 am to Warrior Poet
To me, this means Durkin is the guy. It could also obviously apply to chavis or even foster, but this sounds like Durkin based on Sumlin's comments that I saw:
quote:
I've been told by two very reliable sources that a hire has been made and Kevin Sumlin has his man. Whether we're talking about a signed, sealed and delivered contract or not is not confirmed but what I have heard (again, from more than one trusted, plugged-in source) is that Sumlin has made his choice and that particular Defensive Coordinator has agreed to accept the job. I'll have more as this story develops (including working to get the all-important name, of course) but wanted to pass along what is some pretty significant, stand-alone info before kickoff. It's also a piece of information that would certainly help explain Sumlin's comments and demeanor during yesterday's Liberty Bowl press session.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News