I'm just saying, I don't have anything against Mizz in particular and don't really care who is going to be the whipping boy in the SECCG.

I just think it is a shame that a mediocre team like Mizzou joins the SEC and gets to beat up on a down UF and TN and having no legitimate challenger besides an underachieving Georgia team. There are 5 better teams in the West than than Mizz.

5 ...

Report Post

Posted by JesusQuintana

St Louis

Member since Oct 2013

33366 posts

Posted on 11/4/14 at 10:54 pm to Retrograde

Maybe this year, but not last year. Won't necessarily be the case in future years either.

Maybe it's a shame that a mediocre LSU team gets to ride the coattails of the good West teams to a high ranking? Just a thought...

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bogie00

Tiger in Kansas

Member since Apr 2012

5704 posts

Posted on 11/4/14 at 11:06 pm to Retrograde

quote:
I'm just saying, I don't have anything against Mizz in particular and don't really care who is going to be the whipping boy in the SECCG.

I just think it is a shame that a mediocre team like Mizzou joins the SEC and gets to beat up on a down UF and TN and having no legitimate challenger besides an underachieving Georgia team. There are 5 better teams in the West than than Mizz.

I don't have any problem with your opinion. But Mizzou has been rather down itself since joining SEC. So I don't see your point about down teams in east. Especially since these teams claim far superior recruiting talent, facilities, etc. than Mizzou.

Maybe Mizzou has a pretty good coaching staff and some players who want to win more. Maybe mediocre Mizzou will just be better than the other mediocre teams in the east this year.

Can't help the way the SEC is setup.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SystemsGo

Member since Oct 2014

2774 posts

Posted on 11/4/14 at 11:08 pm to Retrograde

Indiana doe

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by GamerAg