Started By
Message

re: Why can't part of the equation be Conference Champion

Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:15 am to
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:15 am to
What some people are failing to see is that the team that wins the championship doesn't make you the best team, it just makes you the championship team.

The 10-6 regular season Giants beat the undefeated 16-0 regular Patriots in the Super Bowl, making them Super Bowl champions.

They weren't the best team though. The Patriots were consistently the better team, had a better record, and defeated the Giants in the regular season.

However the Giants were the champions and the Patriots were not.

Being the best team does not guarantee a championship. It gives you a hell of a good shot at it, but being champion doesn't mean you are "best"

The only way to truly determine the best team is a large sample size. However you can't have everybody play everybody else 10 times to determine who the best truly is, we have to work off a limited sample size.

And with a small sample size comes a concept known as variance.

That's why the playoff should be open to non-conference champions, however being a conference champion is obviously a huge leg up in that debate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter