Started By
Message
re: SEC refs miss blatant penalty on final play of AU-USCe
Posted on 10/26/14 at 12:28 pm to Sancho Panza
Posted on 10/26/14 at 12:28 pm to Sancho Panza
quote:
Wouldn't fix last nights problem.
1-99 are legal, there are enough numbers, without duplication.
including walk on's, most teams have nearly 120 kids on the team/roster,,, so what you're saying is 99 > 120 ???
thanks for playing, now try again.
The actual problem appears to be that one of the players with dup number actually WAS playing both ways, he was a WR who was put in on defense according to the above poster.
This post was edited on 10/26/14 at 12:29 pm
3
Posted on 10/26/14 at 12:33 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
including walk on's, most teams have nearly 120 kids on the team/roster
I think you are a couple of decades behind the times.
If I am not mistaken there is a roster limit of 105 including walkons. That's 85 schollies and 20 walkons.
120 ended in something like 1977 maybe.
Posted on 10/26/14 at 12:35 pm to Jagd Tiger
Refs probably don't even look for such a penalty.
They missed the same penalty a few years ago when Notre Dame squeaked by Pitt.
Pitt missed a FG in OT that would have wont eh game.
ND had 2 guys with the same number, should have been 5 yards closer and a do-over, instead Pitt goes on to lose in a later OT.
They missed the same penalty a few years ago when Notre Dame squeaked by Pitt.
Pitt missed a FG in OT that would have wont eh game.
ND had 2 guys with the same number, should have been 5 yards closer and a do-over, instead Pitt goes on to lose in a later OT.
Posted on 10/26/14 at 5:12 pm to Jagd Tiger
How many are allowed to dress out?
This post was edited on 10/26/14 at 5:13 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News