re: Ranking the SEC West: The reality behind week 1

I agree here...I would make one change though...Arky over Ole Miss. Ole Miss looked sloppy, have no running game and a shitty QB. Great safeties, really good LB's and one great DT..and 2 solid WR's in Treadwell and that other kid out of Auburn (can't remember his name) that was obviously underrated at 2*'s...but they were sloppy...looked poorly coached on both sides of the ball. I have said it before and will reiterate...Ole Miss does not have it at the line of scrimmage to make any kind of push on the West. Arky will win that game. Arky's much improved on both lines...better QB play and better D. For a half, they gave the defending champs all they could handle.

I have no problem with TAMU over Auburn...we were a bit inconsistent and had everyone worried in the first half. Somehow, TAMU is improved on D and Kenny Hill is a freaking man...and holy crap Seales-Jones and Speedy Noil.

quote:

---

One thing no ones mention on ranking the west is the fact that AU and TAMU are 1-0 in sec play and Arky and USCe are 0-1 in sec.

That fact alone lends me to rank them for what I saw week 1.

1. Tamu
2. Au
3. UA
4. LSU
5. State
6. OM
7. Ark

TAMU looked better than anyone for a complete game. On the road at that.

---