Started By
Message
Taternet in a hissy about SECN ads on their site
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:27 am
Posted on 8/11/14 at 9:27 am
3
Posted on 8/11/14 at 10:00 am to CockInYourEar
What a bunch of whiny bitches. 
And I have no idea how people still use the internet without adblock
And I have no idea how people still use the internet without adblock
Posted on 8/11/14 at 11:57 am to Cockopotamus
They're pretty upset about Bailey too. It's a great day to be a Gamecock and laugh at Clemson.
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 11:58 am
Posted on 8/11/14 at 12:16 pm to BAP2001
quote:
They're pretty upset about Bailey too. It's a great day to be a Gamecock and laugh at Clemson.
They're pretty pissy about the size of our class too
Posted on 8/11/14 at 12:18 pm to CockInYourEar
OP was busted for dropping cookies in his cache illustrating his SEC obsession ... which is what his browser picked-up on and led to the SECN ads push he is experiencing.
I get a lot of gun, camping, outdoor ads on my browser.
I get a lot of gun, camping, outdoor ads on my browser.
Posted on 8/12/14 at 7:07 pm to CockInYourEar
Tater net is in a his say about all things SEC. They want into the SEC so bad that they cannot sleep at night. Let them continue to fret over all things SEC, including the new SEC Network $, which really bothers them.
Posted on 8/12/14 at 7:49 pm to Rooster1
quote:
Tater net is in a his say about all things SEC. They want into the SEC so bad that they cannot sleep at night. Let them continue to fret over all things SEC, including the new SEC Network $, which really bothers them.
Well, they could've been a part of it all, if they would've joined in '92 as well. Instead they stayed in the ACC and got Bowden and Dabo, so good for us I guess.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 8:25 am to CockInYourEar
quote:
Well, they could've been a part of it all, if they would've joined in '92 as well. Instead they stayed in the ACC and got Bowden and Dabo, so good for us I guess.
Had Clemson left the ACC when we did, I would venture to guess that they would've gotten the SEC invitation in '92 instead of us. The SEC wanted FSU, and FSU refused, so the SEC took us. If Clemson were on the board at that time, given the state of our athletic department, I'd imagine Clemmy would've been more attractive.
Rooster, what say you? Am I out to lunch on this one?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News