Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually believe this

Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

You are correct, I used the wrong word, repudiate. I shouldn't type in a hurry.


No worries -- I wasn't being condescending either I just wanted to make sure that I was tracking.

quote:

There are several authors included in the Bible, as well as writing from others during the 1st century.


I touched on Mark, Matthew, Luke and John below, and will touch on others if necessary. (In a response to Stacked.)

quote:

Tacitus


Tacitus doesn't refer to Jesus as a wise teacher, he explains in great detail how they slaughtered the Christians. He wrote that in 116 AD (almost 100 years after Christ had died) and he was born 25 years after Jesus had died. So, he did not witness anything and is only reporting secondhand information.

quote:

Josephus


We touched on this one already and I'll summarize it for easier reading: The text had been changed, altered and augmented several times and was transcribed by early Christians. Josephus, similarly, was born after Jesus had died and didn't bother to write about him until something like 60 years after he died. Also not a direct witness.

quote:

Pliny


We run into a similar problem. His account is mostly about the Christians, nothing to do with Christ. His letter basically outlines the rapid growth of Christianity. Yet again, not another contemporary witness and only going off of what he's been hearing.

quote:

Lucian


Was born almost 100 years after Jesus had died. Not a contemporary witness and did not speak of Christians fondly at all.

quote:

Babylonian Talmud


Eh, I wouldn't quote that one. It mentions that Jesus was a heretic and hung, not crucified.

quote:

As far as showing you something of merit, there is plenty of physical evidence around today of Jesus existence and the world during His day. It really all boils down to what you or I choose to believe, doesn't it?


If I feel something powerful, you will be the first to know, I promise. At this moment I can't bring myself to believe, but will remain with open mind and heart.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119636 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

If I feel something powerful, you will be the first to know, I promise. At this moment I can't bring myself to believe, but will remain with open mind and heart.


Sounds good. Each person has to reach their beliefs in their own way and own time. I will say that Christ compels us to seek Him.

I may have misunderstood the context of the other evidence you were asking for. I thought you were looking for other writers who talked about Jesus, whether contemporaries or not.

Taticus wrote: Nero fastened the guilt . . . on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of . . . Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome.

Pliny wrote: They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food--but food of an ordinary and innocent kind

Josephus wrote: About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he . . . wrought surprising feats. . . . He was the Christ. When Pilate . . .condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared . . . restored to life. . . . And the tribe of Christians . . . has . . . not disappeared

Babylonian Talmud:
On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald . . . cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy.

Let's examine this passage. You may have noticed that it refers to someone named "Yeshu." So why do we think this is Jesus? Actually, "Yeshu" (or "Yeshua") is how Jesus' name is pronounced in Hebrew. But what does the passage mean by saying that Jesus "was hanged"? Doesn't the New Testament say he was crucified? Indeed it does. But the term "hanged" can function as a synonym for "crucified." For instance, Galatians 3:13 declares that Christ was "hanged", and Luke 23:39 applies this term to the criminals who were crucified with Jesus.

Lucian wrote: The Christians . . . worship a man to this day--the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. . . . [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter