Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court rules in favor of Religious companies not covering contraception

Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:27 pm to
And wasn't there a SC case a few years ago where some Quakers said paying taxes was against their religion that the SC ruled against?
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

And wasn't there a SC case a few years ago where some Quakers said paying taxes was against their religion that the SC ruled against?



Yeah, that's why the religious freedom exemption is a bit odd to me.

Who determines which religious gripes are legitimate or not? Can't I just be like "uh, yeah, I'm a member of a religion where I don't have to pay taxes and can't be drafted and should be allowed to own four grenade launchers. It says so in this book here, dude. It's holy 'n' shite." I mean, religious freedom 'n' all, right?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter