Started By
Message
re: Next South Carolina home L?
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:31 pm to Cockopotamus
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:31 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
We lost 3 starters on offense.
3.
Thompson has started before and played well. I'm not sure he'll be the starter all season, but like I said, he still managed to throw for 225 yards against yall.
Mike Davis turning the ball over is the reason we had 0 points heading into the 4th, not Dylan Thompson.
Dylan Thompson sux, dude.
Dawgs return 10 starters on Defense.
10.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 9:40 pm to Dawg4Life47
I'm not sure where you people have been but I'll laugh when Thompson beats UGA and Mizzou. Also Davis had 60 rushing yds and 99 rec yds. Who needs to rush for 100yds when a defense can't stop a simple screen play
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:06 pm to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Dawgs return 10 starters on Defense.
How relevant is that when you're installing a new base defense and losing a ton of coaches?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 3/11/14 at 7:39 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Dawgs return 10 starters on Defense.
10.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
let's see if this math works out.
returning 10 starters from a defense that was abysmal.
+1 new guy
(x)= the number of idiots down for pot, spousal abuse, etc...
math
math
math
math
= same turd defense that made nebraska look decent again this year.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)