Started By
Message
re: A Redditor's Objective Mathematical SEC HC Ranking
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:25 am to joeyb147
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:25 am to joeyb147
quote:
We get it.
You hate the rankings. I didn't do them. I don't fricking care what you think.
All I did was correct Lobster on his false statement.
There you go sport. Random bolding for your comprehension.
You corrected it as if it meant anything substantial. And your "random" bolding is highly inefficient. You should work on going with a large enough sample size to get words like "fricking" and "sport" bolded for better emphasis.
1
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:39 am to randomways
quote:Really?
You corrected it as if it meant anything substantial.
As if it meant anything substantial? Those two complete sentences that took a whopping 11 total words was me making a "substantial" claim to argue with Lobster about the rankings? Really? Did I interject my opinion on the matter in those 11 words? Did I try and start an argument with his opinion in those 11 words? No? I just pointed out a fact he missed?
This post was edited on 3/6/14 at 11:42 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News