Started By
Message
re: a legit and fair question for the HUNH cheerleaders here
Posted on 2/28/14 at 10:30 am to TigersOfGeauxld
Posted on 2/28/14 at 10:30 am to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
quote:Here is what you need to worry about: AU and Oregon have run the purist form of the HUNH over the last 5 years. During that period those teams have made 3 BCSNCG appearences and UO has been in the conversation the last 5 years. They have done it without having the greatest Defenses in the world or #1 signing classes. In Auburn's case they are just now running the Offense that Gus wants the HUNH to be. And that, in a nutshell, is why the "Saban Rule" exists. Anyone saying differently is either lying or deluded. Maybe both.
Saban tried to backdoor the rule in this year because he knew it would not get the votes at a full convention next year. This was his last chance to slow it down.
2
Posted on 2/28/14 at 10:36 am to Irons Puppet
He 's a back door man, he's a back door man
The men don't know but the little girls understand
Don't ever start on the Imperial beer at 8 am and then post, its brutal
The men don't know but the little girls understand
Don't ever start on the Imperial beer at 8 am and then post, its brutal
Posted on 2/28/14 at 10:41 am to Irons Puppet
quote:
Saban tried to backdoor the rule in this year because he knew it would not get the votes at a full convention next year. This was his last chance to slow it down.
I disagree. I think he (and Bert) was trying to backdoor it because he simply thinks it is unfair and wants it NOW and not next year. Somewhat like a spoiled child. He shouldn't have though, I think it would pass, but they may have hurt its chances with the negative media.
It wouldn't really have much effect anyway, especially not on AU, but I'm not sure I support the rule. I just simply support something being done to bring the defense back into the game from the "spectator on the field" status they current hold.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News