re: Brad Edwards just said basically no SEC team

quote:

---

I laugh when people say that. Um Mizzou and South Carolina are in the BCS top 10. I guess UGA and UF have to be in the BCS Top 10 for the East to be good. South Carolina beat 3 teams in the BCS Top 25, Mizzou beat 2 teams in the BCS Top 25.

You'd hardly get 3-4 teams from one division in the BCS Top 10. Ok so UF and UGA are down, now the East have 2 other teams in the BCS Top 10.

---

This all day long. USC just beat FSU's signature win for the FIFTH season in a row. And I can tell you, that was, at best, USC's fourth-toughest game all season. Yet, FSU got a ton of mileage out of it.

I understand that the transitive property is folly in college football arguments, but I'm tired of hearing that the East is down when it has fielded two teams in the top-eight of the BCS, and USC has three wins over the BCS top-18 (which no one else in the country can say. USC may have three teams it beat playing in BCS games, for heaven's sake), and Mizzou has two over the top-25.

Just because it's not UGA and UF at the top doesn't mean the best clubs from the East ain't legit.