Started By
Message
re: Moving Bama and Auburn to the East: isn't that the easiest way?
Posted on 6/9/13 at 4:43 pm to Sheetbend
Posted on 6/9/13 at 4:43 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
If you believe the SEC really wants to save old-geezer, butthurt rivalry games, you are sadly mistaken.
Preserving the oldest butthurt rivalry games for the old-geezers is only the excuse, not the real reason for keeping them.
I have no clue what I just read but am pretty sure it was pointless and ill conceived.
1
Posted on 6/9/13 at 5:29 pm to flyAU
quote:
Preserving the oldest butthurt rivalry games for the old-geezers is only the excuse, not the real reason for keeping them.
quote:Let me draw a picture for our comprehension challenged geeks on the Rant.
I have no clue what I just read but am pretty sure it was pointless and ill conceived.
Who thinks the SEC can't live without Kentucky vs Miss. St., or Vanderbilt vs Ole Miss, or the manufactured Missouri vs Arkansas and TAM vs USCar. games every year?
What the majority of the SEC coaches and school administrators really don't want to lose is the annual matchup of Florida vs LSU--the most dominate divisional powers in the SEC since 2001.
It is not LSU or Florida who is afraid of playing each other, nor is it Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, or Auburn who are the real hypocrites.
The real chicken-shits are the historical Weak-Sister programs of the SEC. They are the ones who keep voting to keep from playing these two SEC perennial powers more often.
They are the real sissys that are hiding from Florida or LSU.
It’s Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Miss. St., and Missouri who are the real sissys that are hiding from Florida or LSU.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News