Started By
Message

re: bama lost alot on both sides of the ball

Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:34 pm to
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Hey sac I tell you what you can throw all of white's EIGHT receptions into the bama toatal if you like. Then compare LSU's four receivers to all five of bama's receivers that are returning. You know the five that actually played last year. Not another carter that was preseason All SEC without ever having played a down for the tide.

If you think what we did head to head doesn't matter then so be it. I would think that is more important than common opponent. When you put the head to head in there then we are just comparing the two teams to the rest of the WEST. What's wrong with that???





I've got an idea. Using only FBS teams, obviously.

Bama's Average Pass D played : 49.9 (so 50th rounded)

LSU's Average Pass D played : 59.8 (so 60th rounded)


Bama's WRs had better numbers on the year against better defenses.
Posted by 167back
Dos Gris
Member since Jun 2012
4714 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:52 pm to
Hold on there sweetness. It's your buddy sac that compared our numbers VS common opponents. I brought up numbers headsup so we would be comparing each other to the SEC west as a whole.

That's pretty much the same competition is it not? Except LSU had to play a much better pass defense team in bama that what bama did in LSU, correct?

So I say when comparing our numbers to the rest of the west it's LSU that played the better pass defense teams. Correct?????

Sometimes a pass defense seems better than it is because that team is much easier to run against. Why risk the chance of an interception??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter