Started By
Message

re: Should Louisville have been invited to the SEC over Mizzou?

Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:45 am to
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Nah, there's no need for two KY teams.




Thank you... You're smart one. Adding Louisville, GT, FSU, Clemson, etc is not going to get us a SEC Network. People might not like Mizzou or aTm or adding a school from a new state, but that's the reason WHY we are now getting a SEC Network just like the Pac 12 and BIG. SEC has done damn good in College Football, won championships in Baseball, Softball, Track and Field, Swimming, Basketball, etc but no SEC Network to watch SEC sports 24/7...

Championships can only take you so far, you have to expand if you want a major network. As much as people complain about ESPN, I thought they'd be happy adding more schools to get your own channel.

And on a side note, not everybody wants to join the SEC. Only Mizzou, aTm, and WVU APPLIED for the SEC in the past few years. Yes you might want FSU, DUKE, UNC, VT, Virginia, etc but whens the last time they made it be known they wanted to join your superior conference. Oh now TV contracts negotiations coming around again now they want so call join???? It's good to say I heard this, heard that but show some links of them itching to join the SEC before Mizzou,WVU, and aTm.
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 8:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter