Started By
Message
re: Who do you NOT want in the SEC
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:45 pm to Tiger Live2
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:45 pm to Tiger Live2
quote:
I can understand that, but I think 16 will be better than 14. Either way, we know more expansion is coming
I know. It just sucks that we can't even play the whole damn conference. I mean Bama hasn't played Kentucky since the 09 season, and probably won't play USCe and UF for another few years. It just sucks. They need to either add more games to the schedule, or get rid of some of these rivalries. Either way no one wins.
4
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:47 pm to rtr14
Do Not Want - anyone that will further bring us down further as a basketball conference.
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:49 pm to rtr14
you are about to be killed by fellow bama fans 
Posted on 3/10/13 at 11:52 pm to rtr14
quote:
I know. It just sucks that we can't even play the whole damn conference. I mean Bama hasn't played Kentucky since the 09 season, and probably won't play USCe and UF for another few years. It just sucks. They need to either add more games to the schedule, or get rid of some of these rivalries. Either way no one wins.
Heard it explained the other day that this sets up for good odds that there will be no rematches in the SECCG according to the computer.
I thought long and hard about it, looked at the various schedules, and to some degree it makes sense.
Think about it, there was the SC/Auburn rematch in '09, but none since and even fewer since they handed the scheduling over to that computer consulting firm that is doing the algorithms with the conference scheduling.
Has there been a rematch in Atlanta other than SC/Aub in '09 and UF/Auburn in 2000? I honestly do not know.
Posted on 3/11/13 at 12:10 am to rtr14
quote:
I know. It just sucks that we can't even play the whole damn conference. I mean Bama hasn't played Kentucky since the 09 season, and probably won't play USCe and UF for another few years. It just sucks. They need to either add more games to the schedule, or get rid of some of these rivalries. Either way no one wins.
That is why I wish we went to a 10 game SEC schedule(yea I know, will never happen). We can keep the rivalries, and still play the other teams semi-regularly. I know personally I don't want LSU to not play UF, Bama, AU, Ole Miss, and A&M every year. But I do wish we played the east teams more often. I don't like the 9 game idea simply because of the difference in home and away games.
If you could do a 9 game schedule with every team having a neutral site game, that would be cool.(yea I know, won't happen)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News