Started By
Message

re: Thanks to SEC and Heisman - A&M receives record 37,000 applications

Posted on 2/1/13 at 6:04 am to
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 2/1/13 at 6:04 am to
quote:

But within the decade of oil discovery on PUF lands, A&M turned tack and demanded a share of the funds Constitutionally directed toward The University of Texas (in short, they wanted the privileges of UT System membership without actually being a member, but that's another story...), which led to the 2/3 UT, 1/3 A&M split, which as I said earlier was opened up yet again to other (but not all) UT and A&M system schools in 1984.




A&M was founded 7 years before tu. I don't see how this bit of history blinds sip idiocy. The funds for which were established under the Morril Land Grant Act. So unless tu opened in 1876 as a Land-Grant College, and the Board of Regents were all figments of people's imagination, the Texas Constitution simply envisioned one system for the state, but was never actually able to see that to fruition from the very beginning, and subsequent legislative actions verified such, and which is why, most explicitly, a brand new board of regents was formed for tu, 7 years after A&M opened. If you want to be technical about the first written piece of legislature establishing our two schools, and fitting a rigid definition to an ambigious act, technically the Morril Act of 1862 funds set aside for Texas A&M came before the Texas Constitution of 1876. But in reality we both know that much like every other state with a land grant school, the schools were separate and different. If not, is to imply that tu opened in 1876 on the land that is now College Station.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 2/2/13 at 12:28 am to
quote:

If you want to be technical about the first written piece of legislature establishing our two schools, and fitting a rigid definition to an ambigious act, technically the Morril Act of 1862 funds set aside for Texas A&M came before the Texas Constitution of 1876.

Not quite.

In 1838/1839 (the Republic of Texas) and in 1858 (the Texas state legislature) adopted legislation describing "The University of Texas."

Federal funding is the difference in the creation dates of UT and Texas A&M, namely the Morrill Act(s). The state of Texas didn't have enough money to adequately fund its envisioned state university, but the feds came along and gave the state a chunk of land in Colorado, and the proceeds were used to start A&M.

That in no form or fashion bestowed upon A&M "the" state university status. If anything, A&M was originally moreso a federal institution.

quote:

But in reality we both know that much like every other state with a land grant school, the schools were separate and different

I can think of one land-grant school that is part of a "University of" system -- North Carolina State (land grant) is part of the University of North Carolina System, and has the same board of governors.

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter