Started By
Message

re: No suspension for Dial

Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:48 am to
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
43683 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:48 am to
What the hell took so long, decision should have been made shortly after the game. SEC office is a joke. He would have been suspended had the next game not been the title game!
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:49 am to
Wrong
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:49 am to
quote:

He would have been suspended had the next game not been the title game!


He would have been suspended had it been warranted
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:56 am to
quote:

What the hell took so long, decision should have been made shortly after the game.


They (many officials, etc.) likely looked at the replay hundreds of times to determine if it was a helmet to helmet hit. To me it was in a gray area where Dial didn't seem to intentionally lead with his helmet but because he is so much bigger than Murray, their helmets definitely collided during the hit. I would have been OK with either interpretation. Regardless, the hit was completely unnecessary since Murray was well away from the action.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter