Started By
Message

re: No suspension for Dial

Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:30 am to
Posted by TideSatchel
Member since Nov 2011
2581 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:30 am to
the only possible argument for a penalty is the helmet to helmet/targeting angle. Murray was in front of the ball carrier and running towards the play. Dial had every right to frick him up, as long as it was a legal hit. As it was, he led with his shoulder, but probably should have been flagged for a targeting foul as he did deliver a blow to the head. But anyone arguing about unnecessary roughness and bringing up defenseless players or parroting brando's idiocy about how it was behind the play and murray wasn't a defender is a fricking idiot. a really butthurt one at that.


regardless, if you thought it should have been a suspension, I wouldn't need many guesses to guess which team you pull for.
This post was edited on 12/14/12 at 9:33 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter