Started By
Message
re: Big 12/SEC Announcement coming today
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:24 pm to 10888bge
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:24 pm to 10888bge
quote:
If a non-national title game SEC champ doesn't play in the Sugar Bowl I'll be disappointed.
It sucks for the sugar bowl, but it's a strong move for the SEC and Big 12 to rival the Rose Bowl. Makes a lot of sense. It's a good power move IMO.
Besides This->
quote:happened in the last Sugar Bowl. and has happened several other times as well.
If a non-national title game SEC champ doesn't play in the Sugar Bowl I'll be disappointed.
This post was edited on 5/18/12 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:27 pm to NATidefan
quote:
It sucks for the sugar bowl, but it's a strong move for the SEC and Big 12 to rival the Rose Bowl. Makes a lot of sense. It's a good power move IMO.
Agreed... that it is a good power move, however I am pretty sure that the Sugar Bowl has a contract(s) with the sec..not 100%.
I would Like to see it as a home & away series, and when it is away from NOLA have the #2 SEC team play.
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:33 pm to NATidefan
quote:
happened in the last Sugar Bowl.
Yea b/c the 2 best were sec teams. I don't have a problem with that.
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:34 pm to NATidefan
quote:
It sucks for the sugar bowl, but it's a strong move for the SEC and Big 12 to rival the Rose Bowl. Makes a lot of sense. It's a good power move IMO.
I kinda feel like the opposite. The Rose Bowl model has kinda faded from relevance.
People somehow think that the Rose Bowl:
1) has always only had big 10 vs pac teams (it hasn't)
2) still has traditional value if it includes runners up from those conferences (it doesn't)
If the SEC and Big 12 add to this silliness by also doing an automatic match-up the whole scene at the top of college football just gets even more messy and unwieldy
The proposed SEC/Big 12 game isn't a tradition yet and should be stopped before it further fouls up the flexibility of college football conferences. No matter what the outcome of that game unless you set up a multiple team playoff field before you start the playoff it just gets even more subjective and prone to manipulation.
If we want to use conference champs as the basis for a playoff then that's fine but it shouldn't be limited to just those four conferences when some years another conference rep will be better than some or all of those champs.
If we want to use a playoff model that doesn't use conference championships as your method for qualification then the whole thing is a distraction (neither the Rose nor the SEC/Big 12 matchup are logical as the first rounds in the playoff)
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News