Started By
Message

re: Delany: If you don't win your division, you can't win it all...

Posted on 5/9/12 at 10:58 pm to
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26994 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 10:58 pm to
The problem with Delaney's position is that once you start to use polls and computers to say the Big 10 champ is more worthy than the Big East champ, if those same polls and computers tell you that the SEC West runner up is more worthy than the Big 10 champ, then you have to honor that. Can't have it both ways.
Posted by big Tiger 1885
Member since Oct 2011
1203 posts
Posted on 5/9/12 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

The problem with Delaney's position is that once you start to use polls and computers to say the Big 10 champ is more worthy than the Big East champ, if those same polls and computers tell you that the SEC West runner up is more worthy than the Big 10 champ, then you have to honor that. Can't have it both ways.


Wouldn't affect big 10 because Wisconsin was 10. LINK

The argument that at larges shouldn't be in only refers to if the champ is in top 6. At which point they should get the edge because they did win their conference. Which isn't easy to do for the good conferences. Yes an at large should be in over a 24 ranked WVU, but not a #5 ranked Oregon
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter