Started By
Message
re: If SEC ever expanded from 14 to 16...
Posted on 4/9/12 at 10:02 am to mizzoukills
Posted on 4/9/12 at 10:02 am to mizzoukills
Barely? You must be joking.
And I'm not talking about "in" certain sports per se. They're nationally relevant. Period. People all across the nation know the basics about KU. Their colors, their mascot. When you mention KU, it paints an image in your head. In short, they're a brand.
I'm not sure how to answer your Arkansas question.
And I'm not talking about "in" certain sports per se. They're nationally relevant. Period. People all across the nation know the basics about KU. Their colors, their mascot. When you mention KU, it paints an image in your head. In short, they're a brand.
I'm not sure how to answer your Arkansas question.
1
Posted on 4/9/12 at 10:06 am to busey
Well, Buse, we have to 100 percent disagree on Kansas as a national brand. Sorry man. They've won 3 national championships in basketball (they claim 5 but 2 of those are disputed by experts as to whether or not they qualify as national championships). Their football sucks arse and so does everything else.
We just have to disagree here. However, you'll succeed in getting other Mizzou posters to respond which is probably your goal.
As for Arkansas, just answer the question. It's not hard. Are they a national brand because they've won a basketball championship? Or, are they a national brand, period? Pretty straightforward question...
We just have to disagree here. However, you'll succeed in getting other Mizzou posters to respond which is probably your goal.
As for Arkansas, just answer the question. It's not hard. Are they a national brand because they've won a basketball championship? Or, are they a national brand, period? Pretty straightforward question...
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News