Started By
Message

re: YouTube is all Over the Punt Ejection - Arkansas

Posted on 10/29/11 at 9:15 pm to
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 10/29/11 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Setting aside the actual hit itself, if he was not flagged for DB USC then he should not have been ejected.

Them's tha rulz.


You can eject a player for one foul if it's deemed flagrant. That is the ACTUAL rule.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 10/29/11 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

You can eject a player for one foul if it's deemed flagrant. That is the ACTUAL rule.


So you are saying he was ejected (for lack of a better term) flagrant kick-catch interference? That is wild.

The hit was brutal/illegal and deserved a flag. If he taunted/celebrated after the hit (I have not seen that evidence) then he should have also drawn a DB USC and (possibly) been ejected. Just does not make sense to me. Guess that is why I am not an SEC official.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter