Started By
Message

re: Updyke evidence or proof he poisoned the trees

Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:36 am to
Posted by Dragon13
Member since Jan 2011
63 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:36 am to
quote:

If I remember correctly all he did was tests the photosynthesis in the leaves with some sort of hand held meter. He may have taken some soil samples, but that takes longer to get results. His whole thing was he didn't think they were poisoned because the leaves didn't show any signs of poisoning. Remember though Harvey did this is the middle of cold November, with plenty of rain.. With those conditions it would take the poison longer to show up in the leaves. The soil samples just turned out to be more concrete evidence they were actually poisoned.


So when he said the trees had not been poisoned, was he lying or incompetent? He claims to be the expert.
Posted by AUnite
The Tragic City
Member since Nov 2010
14828 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 10:39 am to
quote:

So when he said the trees had not been poisoned, was he lying or incompetent? He claims to be the expert.

Did you even bother to read what he wrote?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter