A wee tad? This guy is a fricking nut case to do something like this. Rivalry is one thing but this guy is a fricking criminal. What if this poison has somehow found its way into the water supply and it actually harms people instead of trees?

I don't think he should serve time for this as long as people are not injured but he should lose everything he has in a civil trial against the university after his criminal trial is over.

This guy is an idiot.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TIGERFANZZ

THE Death Valley

Member since Nov 2007

4058 posts

Posted on 2/18/11 at 11:47 am to BamaScoop

quote:
A wee tad?

No argument there scoop, I just wasn't all piss and vinegar yet this morning when I wrote the post. Now that I'm all rawled up, I would probably go with something more along the lines of: "that numbnut has pushed the line WAY beyond rivalry. He not only destroyed landmarks but he endangered people by using 100X's what would be necessary to kill a tree & possibly contaminating a water supply"
As far as serving time, they better make sure the punishment fits the crime because if the barners ain't happy with the ruling, this thing could go on & on until something really bad happens-meaning to people (not statues or trees).

G E A U X T I G E R S!!!

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board