re: Question on determining Cams ReInstatement

quote:

---

Was the burden then on AU to prove in there reinstatement request that AU and Cam had no clue of the events in question, and if so what did they use to show that he had no knowledge other than Cams own word, OR was the burden back on the shoulders of the NCAA again to prove Cam had knowledge, which if they couldnt they had to rule him eligible?

---

Clearly the latter.

You cannot prove someone didn't know something.

Of course if the NCAA receives evidence that Cam DID know it will revisit his eligibility. So that whole 'money was too much' quote to which on one has publicly acknowledged having heard would be clear evidence that Cam knew.

One has to assume that the quote was either fabricated, or the credibility of the person claiming to have heard it is doubted by the NCAA. Otherwise today's ruling would have been different.